Regarding Client Actions defined on a screen, which statement is CORRECT?

Client Actions in OutSystems are designed to encapsulate reusable pieces of logic that can be triggered on the client-side, enhancing the interactivity and responsiveness of web and mobile applications. The statement that you can use a client action within another client action defined on the same screen is correct because it allows developers to create modular and maintainable code. By nesting client actions, they can streamline the application logic and reduce redundancy, making it easier to manage complex interactions on the user interface.

This capability fosters better organization of the code and allows for easier updates and debugging since the developer can adjust one client action without affecting the others. For instance, if multiple actions share a common logic like form validations or UI changes, encapsulating these in a separate client action makes it easier to reuse and maintain.

The other statements do not accurately represent the functionality of client actions. For example, the option suggesting that client actions cannot be used within another client action fails to recognize the flexibility and modularity built into the OutSystems platform. Additionally, the notion that client actions can only be triggered by server actions is misleading, as client actions are inherently executed in response to client-side events, such as user interactions. Lastly, limiting client actions solely to validation overlooks their broader use for various UI manip